#19586: Add is_cayley_graph
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  jaanos             |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.10
      Component:  graph theory       |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  Cayley graphs      |    Merged in:
  groups                             |    Reviewers:
        Authors:  Janoš Vidali       |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:                     |  4aaf3014fee5bb08d861636908d6733047d4a869
  u/jaanos/add_is_cayley_graph       |     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:                     |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by dimpase):

 Replying to [comment:37 ncohen]:
 > > IMHO it's also against the spirit of OOP to have an option in a
 function `f` to return either `X` or `X.blah()`; the user can call
 `.blah()` on the answer he gets himself; and `X` is already created in
 `f`, there is no performance gain in returning X.blah() instead of `X`.
 >
 > Are we sure that a permuation group defined from a set of generators
 returns the *very same* set of generators when you call `.gen()`? Or could
 they be simplified/reduced if Gap believe that another representation is
 better?

 In GAP `GeneratorsOfGroup` need not return the original list of generators
 used to define the group in the first place.
 {{{
   39.2-2 GroupByGenerators

   ‣ GroupByGenerators( gens )
 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── operation
   ‣ GroupByGenerators( gens, id )
 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── operation

   GroupByGenerators  returns  the group G generated by the list gens. If a
 second argument id is present
   then this is stored as the identity element of the group.

   The   value   of   the  attribute  GeneratorsOfGroup  (39.2-4)  of  G
 need  not  be  equal  to  gens.
   GroupByGenerators is the underlying operation called by Group (39.2-1).
 }}}

 I don't know how to recover the original generators from `Group`; it could
 very well be that they get lost, by design.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19586#comment:38>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to