#19781: Fix optional packages
------------------------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: jdemeyer | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-7.0
Component: packages: experimental | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Jeroen Demeyer | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
------------------------------------------+------------------------
Comment (by tscrim):
So for `lie`, I know that you can reach an upstream contact. However, I
don't think they are necessarily active, nor do I think they would care
about improving the build process. So do you think we should rework the
build process or fork the project and split it into 2, one for the library
and one for the interface (this is the part that needs `bison` as I
understand it)? Do you also think we should autotoolize the build as well?
I apologize in advance for the amount of hand-holding I will need for
doing this.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19781#comment:46>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
