#19801: LatticePosets: Add pseudocomplements
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  jmantysalo         |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-7.0
      Component:  combinatorics      |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  lattice            |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Jori Mäntysalo     |    Reviewers:  Daniel Krenn
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  u/jmantysalo/pseudocomplement      |  a9c00e2d691282e6d77a63827b2ada33ceaaeb6d
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by dkrenn):

 Some more comments (sorry I've missed some things last time):

 7. lattices.py, L261: ident to after "(" of line above and PEP8-ify.

 8. INPUT-blocks in hasse_diagram.py and lattices.py: According to
 developer guide put a `--` instead of the `-` after the parameter name.

 9. I see the INPUT/OUTPUT-blocks more as a technical description, so
 instead of
 {{{
 ``element`` - an element of the lattice whose pseudocomplement is
 returned.
 }}}
   I would write simply
 {{{
 ``element`` - an element of the lattice
 }}}
   Similarly in the OUTPUT-block I would rewrite
 {{{
 The pseudocomplement of an ``element``, if it exists. Otherwise ``None``.
 }}}
   to
 {{{
 An element of the lattice or ``None`` if the pseudocomplement does not
 exist.
 }}}
   (maybe rewrite the second part...)
   Now you get the additional information that the element returned is from
 the lattice (instead of the already known fact that I get the
 pseudocomplement).

 10. hasse_diagram.py
 {{{
 [...] It may not exist, and then the function returns ``None``.
 }}}
   This paragraph contains the actual defintion of the pseudocomplement.
 May the return value should be mentioned in the OUTPUT block (add an
 OUTPUT block to this function). INPUT/OUTPUT-block here could say that
 ``element`` and the returned value are integers.

 I hope you don't find this too picky... (on the other hand, you wanted me
 to review it ;) )

 Test pass, doc builds and looks okay.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19801#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to