#19661: the srgs from Cossidente and Penttila construction of hemisystems in
H(3,q^2)
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
       Reporter:         |        Owner:
  dimpase                |       Status:  needs_review
           Type:         |    Milestone:  sage-7.0
  enhancement            |   Resolution:
       Priority:  major  |    Merged in:
      Component:  graph  |    Reviewers:
  theory                 |  Work issues:
       Keywords:         |       Commit:
        Authors:         |  16f1f711fce54ae770c81dd957e5cad2baea8fe1
Report Upstream:  N/A    |     Stopgaps:
         Branch:         |
  public/19661           |
   Dependencies:         |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------

Comment (by dimpase):

 Replying to [comment:33 ncohen]:
 > I am convinced to have voiced my objections to the best of my abilities.
 I do not believe that there is anything I may add that I did not say
 already, which may make my point clearer.
 >
 > On the other hand, I also object to the way the branch is written right
 now, and so I will not review it as it is. I will not object if anybody
 else reviews it, for I do not think it is contrary to any of the *written*
 rules we have in the manual.
 >
 > > Has it ever crossed your mind that strings are Sage objects, too?
 Every piece of code is a string, you know...
 >
 > I take this sentence as a proof that you are making conscious efforts to
 pretend you do not understand what I am saying.
 >

 No, I honestly do not understand what you are trying to say.

 You seem to be saying that I should write some amazing and huge piece of
 code that would then make the task on this ticket more acceptable for you.

 You also seem to be saying that I can use `function_factory` one one hand,
 but I cannot using it one the other hand.

 You also seem to be saying that you fear and distrust GAP code (despite
 using GAP left and right in your work...).

 None of this makes any sense to me.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19661#comment:35>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to