#19781: Move broken optional packages to experimental
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jdemeyer | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: positive_review
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-7.0
Component: packages: | Resolution:
experimental | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers: Travis Scrimshaw
Authors: Jeroen Demeyer | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | dd4e0cde24499ea5d58dfc4b57104a109053b1c6
u/jdemeyer/fix_optional_packages | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by tscrim):
Personally, I don't either, but I'm not an expert on build systems, trying
to be a team player, and subsequently don't have any strong objections or
reasons for not doing it. (Although I very slightly object to calling it
broken.)
I would like to learn how to use autotools (and subsequently autotoolize
`coxeter3`) and autotoolizing `LiE` is definitely something I want to do
and I agree should be done. Moving it to experimental does give me more
motivation to do it.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19781#comment:66>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.