#19851: Interpreter cell magics in Jupyter
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vbraun | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: positive_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-7.0
Component: interfaces | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Volker Braun | Reviewers: Emmanuel Charpentier
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/vbraun/interpreter_cell_magics_in_jupyter|
6f7176f3f9981af65af8fbb4724def5f9bae6d6e
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by charpent):
* status: needs_review => positive_review
* reviewer: => Emmanuel Charpentier
Comment:
Given that :
- It passes ptestlong with no errors ;
- It gives an interesting fictionality at least for R and Gap (I didn't
test other interpreters, for lack of knowledge...) ;
- The Maxima problem has been isolated to (probably) unrelated ;
- The access to help items is yet another problem (and can be worked
around) ;
it appears that this patch does what it advertises. ==> positive_review.
I still have '''whishes''' about this "interpreter" issue, (i. e. graphs),
but I doubt there is a "one call fits all" solution, given that the
current pexpect interface can only give us stdin dumps, and won't
universally capture graphical output. I think that specialized interfaces
are necessary for each of the interpreters we wish to use.
But that should be separate tickets.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19851#comment:16>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
