#20029: Implement quantum matrix coordinate algebras
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  tscrim             |        Owner:  tscrim
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_work
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-7.1
      Component:  algebra            |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  quantum,           |    Merged in:
  coordinate ring                    |    Reviewers:  Daniel Bump, Valentin
        Authors:  Travis Scrimshaw   |  Buciumas
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  public/algebras/quantum_matrix_coordinate_ring-20029|  
087245c395b4d6b3f0f9b53e5e77100121c9bce1
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by tscrim):

 * status:  needs_review => needs_work


Comment:

 I've added a class for GL,,q,,(n), but it currently fails the antipode
 test. I've also changed the convention from `q^2` to `q`. I just ran
 another test and it says that it is failing associativity, so the bug is
 probably in the multiplication code.

 However, can you check to make sure the following data is correct?
 {{{
 sage: O = algebras.QuantumGL(2)
 sage: O.quantum_determinant()
 x[1,1]*x[2,2] - q*x[1,2]*x[2,1]
 sage: for g in O.algebra_generators():
 ....:     print "{:>8}{:>33}{:>35}{:>2}".format(g, g.antipode(),
 ....:                                           g.coproduct(), g.counit())
   x[1,1]                         c*x[2,2]  x[1,1] # x[1,1] + x[1,2] #
 x[2,1] 1
   x[1,2]                 -(q^-1)*c*x[2,1]  x[1,1] # x[1,2] + x[1,2] #
 x[2,2] 0
   x[2,1]                      -q*c*x[1,2]  x[2,1] # x[1,1] + x[2,2] #
 x[2,1] 0
   x[2,2]                         c*x[1,1]  x[2,1] # x[1,2] + x[2,2] #
 x[2,2] 1
        c  x[1,1]*x[2,2] - q*x[1,2]*x[2,1]                              c #
 c 1
 }}}
 This agrees with Valentin's paper if `c = 1`.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20029#comment:15>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to