#20029: Implement quantum matrix coordinate algebras
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: tscrim | Owner: tscrim
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-7.1
Component: algebra | Resolution:
Keywords: quantum, | Merged in:
coordinate ring | Reviewers: Daniel Bump, Valentin
Authors: Travis Scrimshaw | Buciumas
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
public/algebras/quantum_matrix_coordinate_ring-20029|
6772f0c377b9eab5b4e0d67652b1493e8adb6d7d
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by buciumas):
I looked over the document and it looks good!
I would suggest adding a note saying what q-convention you are using. For
example the q squared in your document would be just a q in Chari and
Pressley or in Kassel (or FRT for that matter). I think this would save
some confusion for people that don't now about this.
Certain things that could be implemented going forward could be an
antipode map for GL_q(n) and maybe the same construction for other
classical types (see FRT). The quantum determinant is then replaced by the
quantum similitude.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20029#comment:6>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
