#19884: LatticePosets: Add is_relatively_complemented()
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jmantysalo | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-7.1
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: latticeposet | Merged in:
Authors: Jori Mäntysalo | Reviewers: Travis Scrimshaw
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/jmantysalo/relatively_complemented|
a08fac06be39a07de8f1c82ba0d0f2a3733579be
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by jmantysalo):
* status: needs_review => needs_work
Comment:
Replying to [comment:9 tscrim]:
> Then we should merge it in and set it as a dependency. It's already
positively reviewed, so there shouldn't be any issues.
But if we just wait for the next beta, shouldn't this then work without
any extra job to do?
I made changes you suggested, but I'm compiling and testing - so this is
in ''needs_work''.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19884#comment:11>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
