#19435: Poset documentation polishing: New posets from old ones
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jmantysalo | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-7.2
Component: documentation | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Jori Mäntysalo | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/jmantysalo/poset_documentation_polishing__new_posets_from_old_ones|
41e3a4b15d9e38f74cf865afd04a3b79d1fa38ce
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by jmantysalo):
* status: new => needs_review
* commit: => 41e3a4b15d9e38f74cf865afd04a3b79d1fa38ce
* milestone: sage-6.10 => sage-7.2
Comment:
This is a long but quite trivial patch. Mostly bikeshedding.
I don't know easy way to make `with_bounds()` work with non-facade posets.
At least now the code gives nicer error message. I also changed
`completion_by_cuts()` to return the empty lattice from the empty poset.
It is now consistent with definition "smallest lattice containing..."
----
New commits:
||[http://git.sagemath.org/sage.git/commit/?id=41e3a4b15d9e38f74cf865afd04a3b79d1fa38ce
41e3a4b]||{{{Slight modifications to documentation.}}}||
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19435#comment:2>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
