#19435: Poset documentation polishing: New posets from old ones
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jmantysalo | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-7.2
Component: documentation | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Jori Mäntysalo | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/jmantysalo/poset_documentation_polishing__new_posets_from_old_ones|
41e3a4b15d9e38f74cf865afd04a3b79d1fa38ce
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by jmantysalo):
* status: needs_review => needs_work
Comment:
Replying to [comment:3 kdilks]:
> * I'm not happy about the definition of Dedekind-Macneille completion
being vague about the concept of 'smallest' and not being explicit about
the original poset being an induced subposet of the lattice, but I suppose
it matches what Wikipedia has, and does link to the full Wikipedia
article.
Could we have an option to show this clearly? I.e. somehow show what are
"original" and "added" elements on the completion?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19435#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
