#20274: LatticePoset: trivial additions
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jmantysalo | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-7.2
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: latticeposet | Merged in:
Authors: Jori Mäntysalo | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/jmantysalo/latticeposet__trivial_additions|
99aec522e045a94023075c7c3f88f249245b29b1
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by jmantysalo):
* status: new => needs_review
* commit: => 99aec522e045a94023075c7c3f88f249245b29b1
Old description:
> Few problems at finiten lattices: 1) Operators `+` and `*` for meet and
> join are not documented, 2) example of `breadth()` is stupid as it just
> `BoolenaLattice(4)` and 3) `is_supersolvable()` fails for empty lattice.
> This patch corrects those.
New description:
Few problems at finite lattices: 1) Operators `+` and `*` for meet and
join are not documented, 2) example of `breadth()` is stupid as it just
`BoolenaLattice(4)` and 3) `is_supersolvable()` fails for empty lattice.
This patch corrects those.
--
Comment:
New commits:
||[http://git.sagemath.org/sage.git/commit/?id=99aec522e045a94023075c7c3f88f249245b29b1
99aec52]||{{{Trivial fixes to lattices.py.}}}||
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20274#comment:2>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
