#5597: [with patch, needs review] rename coercion action methods
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Reporter: robertwb | Owner: robertwb
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.1.3
Component: coercion | Keywords:
Work_issues: | Author:
Reviewer: | Merged:
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Comment(by nthiery):
Hi Robert,
Sorry for hopping so late in the discussion. I am not sure how I
understand how left vs right actions are handled.
In a*b, are you always making the assumption that a is acting on b?
If I have an algebra B (whose code I don't want to touch), and implement a
right B-module A,
am I supposed to implement:
a.act_on(b)?
Or will a*b try all of:
b.act_on(a, False)
b.acted_upon(a, False)
a.act_on(b, True)
a.acted_upon(b, True)
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5597#comment:6>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---