#5597: [with patch, needs review] rename coercion action methods
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  robertwb  |       Owner:  robertwb    
       Type:  defect    |      Status:  needs_review
   Priority:  major     |   Milestone:  sage-4.1.3  
  Component:  coercion  |    Keywords:              
Work_issues:            |      Author:              
   Reviewer:            |      Merged:              
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------

Comment(by nthiery):

 Hi Robert,

 Sorry for hopping so late in the discussion. I am not sure how I
 understand how left vs right actions are handled.

 In a*b, are you always making the assumption that a is acting on b?

 If I have an algebra B (whose code I don't want to touch), and implement a
 right B-module A,
 am I supposed to implement:

    a.act_on(b)?

 Or will a*b try all of:

    b.act_on(a, False)
    b.acted_upon(a, False)
    a.act_on(b, True)
    a.acted_upon(b, True)

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5597#comment:6>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to