#5597: [with patch, needs review] rename coercion action methods
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Reporter: robertwb | Owner: robertwb
Type: enhancement | Status: positive_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.2
Component: coercion | Keywords: actions, left actions, right
actions
Work_issues: | Author: Robert Bradshaw
Reviewer: Nicolas M. Thiéry | Merged:
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Changes (by newvalueoldvalue):
* keywords: => actions, left actions, right actions
* reviewer: => Nicolas M. Thiéry
* type: defect => enhancement
* status: needs_review => positive_review
* author: => Robert Bradshaw
Comment:
Replying to [comment:9 robertwb]:
> But then we're back to the same problem of {{{s.acted_upon_right(p)}}}
not being obvious whether s or p was the one on the right (though it's a
bit better).
It sounds rather clear to me.
> In any case, this behavior is easy to implement in a superclass.
Yes.
> So, is this a positive review (pending all doctests passing, which they
did last I checked)?
Yes, I just wanted to discuss the matter first. Also, part of this may
become obsolete once I will have a prototype implementation of overloaded
operators/functions as in MuPAD, with a declarative interface (the Sage-
combinat people need them anyway for other purposes). I'll post here a
link to the appropriate ticket when times come.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5597#comment:10>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
