#5597: [with patch, needs review] rename coercion action methods
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Reporter: robertwb | Owner: robertwb
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.2
Component: coercion | Keywords:
Work_issues: | Author:
Reviewer: | Merged:
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Comment(by robertwb):
But then we're back to the same problem of {{{s.acted_upon_right(p)}}} not
being obvious whether s or p was the one on the right (though it's a bit
better). In any case, this behavior is easy to implement in a superclass.
So, is this a positive review (pending all doctests passing, which they
did last I checked)?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5597#comment:9>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
