#20381: Patch to brial to get it building again on Cygwin
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: embray | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-7.2
Component: build | Resolution:
Keywords: cygwin windows | Merged in:
brial | Reviewers:
Authors: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: u/embray/brial- | 5bbcadaa8b0d9a14357cfa4aed31a4bf95f23b30
cygwin-patch | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by embray):
That said, [https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2010-01/msg00791.html this post]
seems to make a good argument that Cygwin's behavior is *more* correct
than the standard gcc in this regard. It's inconvenient but seemingly not
wrong. So maybe just forget about it and just bring the issue to brial.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20381#comment:2>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
