#20370: generic GCD-free basis
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  mmezzarobba        |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-7.2
      Component:  algebra            |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                     |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Marc Mezzarobba    |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  u/mmezzarobba/20370-gcd_free_basis |  a0a246ad399f4e2bd9c69d32e91fd8de1321c7fa
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by mmezzarobba):

 Hi Bruno,

 Replying to [comment:2 bruno]:
 > Salut Marc ! I have doubts concerning the return type of this new
 function. First, I always wonder one should use Python's `set` or Sage's
 `Set`. But also I wonder whether these bases should be returned as sets:
 In all cases I've found (≠ all cases, probably), bases are returned as
 lists (or `PolynomialSequence_generic` for polynomials) and not sets.
 Wouldn't it be more consistent to return a list there too?

 Thanks for your comment. I have no opinion on the matter, and I'd be happy
 to change the return type to whatever you prefer.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20370#comment:3>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to