#20555: descents for Permutations : cleanup
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
       Reporter:         |        Owner:
  chapoton               |       Status:  needs_review
           Type:         |    Milestone:  sage-7.2
  enhancement            |   Resolution:
       Priority:  major  |    Merged in:
      Component:         |    Reviewers:  Travis Scrimshaw, Christian Stump
  combinatorics          |  Work issues:
       Keywords:         |       Commit:
  permutation            |  0e1c23bc2d7326980c1970e7fc0fcb379a629f78
        Authors:         |     Stopgaps:
  Frédéric Chapoton      |
Report Upstream:  N/A    |
         Branch:         |
  u/chapoton/20555       |
   Dependencies:         |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------

Comment (by stumpc5):

 > So in general I think we do expect descents to be elements of the index
 set.

 I see, I was actually missing this point before.

 > Concerning the second point, should I really change that ? I would
 prefer not to.

 Okay, your decision.

 Waiting for the patchbot, and also for Travis' okay...

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20555#comment:24>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to