#7703: S-units, S-class groups, and selmer groups of etale algebras
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  rlm            |       Owner:  was                        
       Type:  enhancement    |      Status:  needs_work                 
   Priority:  major          |   Milestone:  sage-4.3.1                 
  Component:  number theory  |    Keywords:  number fields selmer groups
Work_issues:                 |      Author:  Robert Miller              
   Upstream:  N/A            |    Reviewer:  John Cremona               
     Merged:                 |  
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Changes (by cremona):

  * keywords:  => number fields selmer groups
  * reviewer:  => John Cremona
  * status:  needs_review => needs_work


Comment:

 As soon as I tried out an example of my own I hit a problem -- the
 functions S_class_group(), S_unit_group() and selmer_group() only apply to
 objects of type
 'sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_quotient_ring.PolynomialQuotientRing_field'
 and not to number fields!  The first thing I wanted to do was
 {{{
 sage: K.<a> = QuadraticField(-23)
 sage: K.selmer_group([],3)
 }}}
 and that does not work, you have to form the polynomial ring K[] and then
 quotient out the generator x to get something isomorphic to K which has
 forgotten that it is a number field.

 Can we not design things so that number fields are a special case of etale
 algebras in a slightly more transparent way?  Failing that, can we not
 implement the three functions just mentioned for number fields directly?
 This is what I would need!

 If that would be easy, I suggest adding it right now before merging this
 in.  But if there are difficulties, I could be persuaded to get this in
 now as it is as long as there was a clear TODO and a new ticket to do what
 I want.

 I have therefore tagged the ticket as "needs work", but you (rlm) should
 feel free to argue for the second option, put it back to "needs review"
 and (if I am convinced by the argument ;)) will come back to give it a
 positive review.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7703#comment:13>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.


Reply via email to