#8800: Doctest coverage of categories
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: SimonKing | Owner: Simon King
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.4.2
Component: categories | Keywords: categories doctests
Author: Simon King | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment(by SimonKing):
Hi Robert!
Replying to [comment:27 robertwb]:
> MatrixFunctor.__init__, is there not a module category that could be
used in place of {{{CommutativeAdditiveGroups}}}? I guess if tbe basering
is unknown then that's more difficult.
Yes, {{{Modules()}}} requires a base ring. There is currently no category
of modules, but only a category of R-modules for any ring R. This is why I
used {{{CommutativeAdditiveGroups()}}} in several cases.
> Missing periods on {{{VectorFunctor.__cmp__}}} and
{{{VectorFunctor.merge}}}.
Missing where? In the doc string?
Concerning positive review, note that technically this ticket depends on
#8807, which has no review yet.
Best regards,
Simon
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8800#comment:28>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
