#8896: 0.0000000000000000000000000000 is parsed completely differently than
1.0000000000000000000000000000 for no good reason
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  was               |       Owner:  AlexGhitza  
       Type:  defect            |      Status:  needs_review
   Priority:  minor             |   Milestone:  sage-4.4.3  
  Component:  basic arithmetic  |    Keywords:              
     Author:                    |    Upstream:  N/A         
   Reviewer:                    |      Merged:              
Work_issues:                    |  
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
Changes (by robertwb):

  * status:  needs_work => needs_review


Comment:

 Replying to [comment:6 leif]:
 > No, the {{{else}}} belongs to the {{{for}}} statement.

 Exactly.

 > But currently, ''leading'' zeros contribute to the precision, too: :)
 > {{{
 > sage: RealNumber(0.000000000000000000).prec()
 > 67
 > sage: RealNumber(00.000000000000000000).prec()
 > 70
 > sage: RealNumber(.000000000000000000).prec()
 > 64
 > }}}
 > I'm not sure if this is intentional, it's at least uncommon.

 That's the point of this ticket. For 0, all zeros are leading.

 > (And a leading {{{+}}} also increases the precision.)
 >
 > It looks as if a decimal point is counted as a significant digit.

 Good catch, fixed. That required some adjustment to keep the input/str in
 sync.

 > And, sorry, the code is extremely ugly (not due to the patch) and
 inefficient.
 > Examples and parameter description can be improved as well.
 >
 > I'm not quite sure what kind of strings actually get in (i.e., where/if
 illegal syntax is catched, it seems all is left to {{{RealNumber._set()}}}
 if not already handled by the parser), this should perhaps be documented,
 too.

 Updated the docstring a bit. This is mostly for use by the preparser,
 though of course it gets used directly as well.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8896#comment:9>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to