#8896: 0.0000000000000000000000000000 is parsed completely differently than
1.0000000000000000000000000000 for no good reason
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  was               |       Owner:  AlexGhitza  
       Type:  defect            |      Status:  needs_review
   Priority:  minor             |   Milestone:  sage-4.4.3  
  Component:  basic arithmetic  |    Keywords:              
     Author:                    |    Upstream:  N/A         
   Reviewer:                    |      Merged:              
Work_issues:                    |  
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------

Comment(by leif):

 Replying to [comment:10 robertwb]:
 > Replying to [comment:7 leif]:
 > > Also, is it intentional that the exponent is ignored when computing
 the required precision?
 > > E.g., {{{1.0e-1000000000}}} as well as {{{1.0e-10000000000}}} evaluate
 to zero, because of only 53 bits precision.
 >
 > Yes, of course. The size of the exponent is completely orthogonal to the
 number of significant figures.

 I don't agree either. If the "effective" exponent (the one in normalized
 form) exceeds the maximum, one should either increase {{{prec}}}
 accordingly or - more practical - raise an exception.

 If not, this could be a pitfall. But '''I''' don't mind... ;-)

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8896#comment:16>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to