#9336: Improve doctest coverage for sage/rings/number_field
--------------------------------------------+-------------------------------
Reporter: davidloeffler | Owner: davidloeffler
Type: defect | Status: positive_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.5
Component: number fields | Keywords: doctest
Author: David Loeffler | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: John Cremona, Francis Clarke | Merged:
Work_issues: |
--------------------------------------------+-------------------------------
Changes (by fwclarke):
* status: needs_review => positive_review
* reviewer: John Cremona => John Cremona, Francis Clarke
Comment:
Replying to [comment:6 davidloeffler]:
> Here's a new patch ...
That works fine, so back to positive review.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9336#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
