#8989: Add support for Fano toric varieties
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
   Reporter:  novoselt            |       Owner:  AlexGhitza
       Type:  enhancement         |      Status:  needs_work
   Priority:  major               |   Milestone:  sage-4.5  
  Component:  algebraic geometry  |    Keywords:            
     Author:  Andrey Novoseltsev  |    Upstream:  N/A       
   Reviewer:  Volker Braun        |      Merged:            
Work_issues:                      |  
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------

Comment(by vbraun):

 So just to get this straight, there will be a `CompleteIntersection` class
 (to be implemented in the future) analogous to the already-implemented
 `AnticanonicalHypersurface`. Only `CompleteIntersection` will know about
 the nef partition, but not the ambient `CPRFanoToricVariety_field`.

 Then, there will be methods (perhaps with `_star` instead of `_polar`)
 {{{
 CI.Delta(i), i=1..r
 CI.nabla(i), i=1..r
 CI.Delta() = convex hull( CI.Delta(i) )
 CI.Delta_polar() = Minkowski sum( CI.nabla(i) )
 CI.nabla() = convex hull( CI.nabla(i) )
 CI.nabla_polar(j) = Minkowski sum( CI.Delta(i) )
 }}}
 for the usual polytopology of nef partitions. The only relations to the
 polytopes of the ambient toric variety are
 {{{
 cpr_fano.Delta() == CI.Delta()
 cpr_fano.Delta_polar() == CI.Delta_polar()
 }}}

 That would be fine with me. A `Delta_polar_to_coordinate` method is ok,
 too.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8989#comment:16>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to