#9351: deps for sagetex with SAGE_CHECK='yes'
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Reporter: jhpalmieri | Owner: tbd
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.5
Component: spkg-check | Resolution: fixed
Keywords: | Author: John Palmieri
Upstream: N/A | Reviewer: David Kirkby
Merged: | Work_issues:
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Comment(by drkirkby):
Replying to [comment:10 rlm]:
> I was thinking that while working on this release. It makes me wonder
whether they should actually go in `$SAGE_LOCAL/bin`. Even though they
don't really quite belong there, that would eliminate the need for another
repo. Is it possible to have just these two files under revision control
from somewhere else?
IMHO it would be good if $SAGE_ROOT under revision control, so things like
the 'makefile', README.txt were too. Then $SAGE_ROOT/spkg/install and
$SAGE_ROOT/spkg/standard/deps could be part of that repository.
I don't see $SAGE_ROOT/spkg/install would be too out of place in
$SAGE_ROOT/local/bin, as it is an executable shell script.
$SAGE_ROOT/spkg/standard/deps would seem more out of place I would admit,
which is why perhaps another repository would not be a bad idea. I think
there are more than just these two files that would be better put under
revision control.
Dave
Dave
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9351#comment:12>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
