#6456: Upgrade cvxopt in sage from 0.9 to 1.1.2
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  was               |       Owner:  mabshoff  
       Type:  defect            |      Status:  needs_info
   Priority:  major             |   Milestone:  sage-4.5.2
  Component:  packages          |    Keywords:            
     Author:  schilly, dimpase  |    Upstream:  N/A       
   Reviewer:                    |      Merged:            
Work_issues:                    |  
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------

Comment(by drkirkby):

 Replying to [comment:27 schilly]:
 > Replying to [comment:26 jhpalmieri]:
 > > Any ideas why the new spkg is so much smaller than the old one?
 >
 > iirc we have removed documentation and examples. They are not exposed in
 any way or not used at all (tex sources).

 I don't think that was such a good idea, as the documentation and the
 examples can be used to test the package. To quote from the {{{INSTALL}}}
 file.

 {{{
 Test it:
 --------
 To test that the installation was successful, go to the examples
 directory and try one of the examples, for example,

     $ cd examples/doc/chap8
     $ python lp
 }}}

 So if a spkg-check file was created, whilst leaving the documentation and
 examples in place, it would be possible to check this.

 Given there is only one .spkg which will be merged in 4.5.2, would it not
 be better to work on this a bit more? I can see some obvious things that
 could be improved.

  * Put back the examples and documentation.
  * Add an spkg-check file and test the examples - this will only happen if
 SAGE_CHECK=yes
  * Try removing all the Solaris specific patches. I just did a '''very'''
 quick test on an !OpenSolaris machine, and found this built without those
 patches.
  * Change the directory structure to what is standard in Sage, and not as
 it is now.
  * Remove the patches from #9598, which IMHO have not been checked
 carefully.

 I'll leave it up to you guys how you resolve it. If you want me to make a
 package based on that above, I'd be willing to do it.

 Dave

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6456#comment:46>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to