#5396: Wrapping lcalc library
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  rishi              |         Owner:  rishi                          
        
     Type:  enhancement        |        Status:  closed                         
        
 Priority:  major              |     Milestone:  sage-4.5.2                     
        
Component:  number theory      |    Resolution:  fixed                          
        
 Keywords:  lcalc              |        Author:  Rishikesh, Yann Laigle-Chapuy  
        
 Upstream:  N/A                |      Reviewer:  John Cremona, David Kirkby, 
Alex Ghitza
   Merged:  sage-4.5.2.alpha1  |   Work_issues:                                 
        
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------

Comment(by rishi):

 This ticket is not about lcalc spkg. Please do not add junk to this
 ticket. I am replying to the latest closed ticket about the spkg  #9665

 Replying to [comment:95 fbissey]:
 > Replying to [comment:94 drkirkby]:
 > > Replying to [comment:93 fbissey]:
 > >
 > > > I think it is a remnant from a time where Dave (Kirby) had an
 extremely
 > > > simplified Makefile for lcalc and even then it was a case of
 overlinking.
 > > > Francois
 > >
 > > My logic for changing the Makefile fell into 3 reasons I think.
 > >  * The original Makefile had a non-portable gcc option -Wa,-W in an
 attempt to suppress warnings from the assembler. That works with the GNU
 assembler, but failed with the Sun assembler, as the Sun assembler does
 not recognise the -W option.
 > >  * I added -Wall to show the warnings from the code - I think it's
 good we see what warnings are generated by the compiler, as it is
 something to look at when getting problems.
 > >  * The original Makefile defined the compiler to be "gcc" but if we
 used $CC, we could use any compiler.
 > >
 > > I doubt I would have changed any linking - if I did, it was probably
 not intentionally.
 > >
 > > I have not checked this code when CC is defined to be a compiler other
 than gcc, but I did fix it to work with any compiler at one point - I hope
 a regression has not been introduced.
 > >
 > Hi Dave,
 >
 > the makefile needed some sanity put back into it, especially linker
 wise.
 > so that was a job that was needed. I guess my main concern here
 is:[[BR]]
 >
 > *lcalc depends on mpfr when it shouldn't.[[BR]]
 >
 > The rest is just my ramblings about there being an unused variable in
 > spkg-install - which may lead people to think it is.[[BR]]
 >
 > Francois

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5396#comment:96>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to