#9808: Upgrade numpy to 1.5.0rc1 and scipy to 0.8
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  maldun           |       Owner:  maldun      
       Type:  task             |      Status:  needs_work  
   Priority:  major            |   Milestone:  sage-4.6    
  Component:  packages         |    Keywords:  numpy, scipy
     Author:  Stefan Reiterer  |    Upstream:  N/A         
   Reviewer:                   |      Merged:              
Work_issues:                   |  
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------

Comment(by jason):

 Replying to [comment:12 fbissey]:
 > Replying to [comment:11 drkirkby]:
 > > Replying to [comment:10 fbissey]:
 > > > Ok - so we still use g95 on some targets. So we need to keep some
 patches
 > > > just for these - bother.
 > > I don't believe g95 is used anywhere. There are g95 binaries in the
 Fortran package in Sage, but William said they can be removed. There is a
 gfortran binary. So as far as I'm aware, all g95 stuff can be removed, but
 {{{SAGE_FORTRAN}}} can't be removed.
 > >
 > That's good! That means we probably can give the shove to the gnu.py and
 __init__.py
 > patches. I wouldn't be sorry to see the back of these.
 >
 > There is a comment in SPKG.txt:
 > {{{
 > Special Update/Build Instructions:
 >   * The file $SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage/sage/ext/numpy.pxi comes from this
 file and must be updated if/when
 >     the file src/numpy/doc/cython/numpy.pxi is updated.
 > }}}
 > I cannot find the file in question in that location. There is however a
 numpy.pxi under src/numpy/random/mtrand but I am not sure that's the file
 in question.
 > Furthermore I don't appear to have a numpy.pxi in
 $SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage/sage/ext/numpy.pxi .
 > Does anyone know if these instructions are obsolete?

 I think I was the one that added those instructions, and I'm pretty sure
 they're obsolete instructions now.  I believe we took care of merging the
 differences between the two numpy.pxi/pxd files a while ago.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9808#comment:14>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to