#9808: Upgrade numpy to 1.4.1 and scipy to 0.8
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Reporter: maldun | Owner: maldun
Type: task | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.6
Component: packages | Keywords: numpy, scipy
Author: Stefan Reiterer | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Comment(by maldun):
Replying to [comment:59 kcrisman]:
> Replying to [comment:58 maldun]:
> > Replying to [comment:57 kcrisman]:
> > > I'm getting a corrupted package message with the packages right now
while trying it on a different system. Did something get changed with
respect to the file with this latest update?
> >
> > Yes we did some changes to the spkg-install. But I downloaded and
installed the package right now again. So I don't know wehre the problem
is lying?
> >
>
> Did you use `sage -pkg` to create it or just do some kind of
compression? I get a message about `tar: this does not look like a file
archive` and `tar: Archive contains obsolescent base-64 headers`. I just
installed the optional biopython package on this machine to test things,
so the machine shouldn't be the problem (and it built Sage 4.5.2 just
fine).
Ok I repacked it now with -pkg and uploaded it. Does it work now?
And sorry for the newby question: what is the difference between -pkg and
just compress it?
Is sage using a different version of tar? Because in fact a spkg is noting
else then a tar.gz with different ending.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9808#comment:60>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
