#9873: Create Mac Application that people love to use
---------------------------------------------------------------+------------
   Reporter:  iandrus                                          |       Owner:  
iandrus      
       Type:  enhancement                                      |      Status:  
needs_review 
   Priority:  major                                            |   Milestone:  
sage-wishlist
  Component:  user interface                                   |    Keywords:  
mac          
     Author:  Ivan Andrus                                      |    Upstream:  
N/A          
   Reviewer:  Karl-Dieter Crisman, Jason Grout, John Palmieri  |      Merged:   
            
Work_issues:                                                   |  
---------------------------------------------------------------+------------

Comment(by kcrisman):

 > > I noticed that if you bdist from a Sage that doesn't have its
 documentation built, the first half of help pages don't exist.  (This
 could happen if, for instance, LaTeX wasn't in the path of the build.)  I
 don't know if this means they should be the live ones after all, which
 build (just not as nicely) without TeX... not sure about this.
 >
 > It would be good to always have the documentation.  Perhaps someone who
 knows more about the documentation could give some insight into what would
 be preferred.  The only thing that I want is that it be offline, i.e.
 doesn't need network access.

 I think that the 'live' documentation only needs the local browser and the
 ability to connect that way.   No actual network connection is needed,
 just on the person's computer.

 > > Also, it's not possible to use a browser other than the system browser
 on 10.4 now.  What is the connection between this and the Dock - that is,
 why does it show up as a sub-preference?
 >
 > If the application doesn't show up in the dock then the windows don't
 belong to any application (like the Preferences window now).  I think this
 would be extremely confusing and nearly impossible to work with.  It's
 okay for Preferences because it's a single window.

 Thanks for clarifying that.
 > Can we just change the OS X README to have a section about Sage.app and
 a section for the case that it's not created since it will still be
 possible to create a binary distribution without Sage.app?

 That sounds like a great solution.  You can finally remove that part about
 OS X gurus - because you are one now :)

 Great, really close now!  I think the relevant file can be checked in
 using `hg_scripts`, so you'd probably want to just make it depend on the
 already existing `hg_scripts` change for `bdist`.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9873#comment:85>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to