#9960: require SAGE_CHECK to be "yes"
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Reporter: jhpalmieri | Owner: was
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.6.1
Component: user interface | Keywords:
Author: John Palmieri | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Comment(by leif):
The only side-effect of ''sourcing'' {{{sage-env}}} twice is that some
variables (e.g. {{{LD_LIBRARY_PATH}}}) get redundant entries.
We ''could'' in principle prevent such by an
{{{
#!C
#ifndef FOO
#define FOO
...
#endif
}}}
analogon. But IMHO a minor issue...
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9960#comment:29>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
