#10025: sloane_sequence(111776)[2][:36] != sloane.A111776.list(36)
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
Reporter: donmorrison | Owner: sage-combinat
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-4.6.1
Component: combinatorics | Keywords: combinat sloane
Author: Yann Laigle-Chapuy | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
Comment(by drkirkby):
Yes, i missed the first patch needed to be applied first.
Should this not return an error, rather than waste bandwidth looking on
the database?
{{{
sage: sloane_find(32.23)
Searching Sloane's online database...
[]
}}}
I's also puzzled that
{{{
sage: sloane_find(sin(x)) # where I have not defined x
Searching Sloane's online database...
}}}
should actually produce any output, but it does.
I'm not really into OEIS, so perhaps I'm mistaken.
Dave
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10025#comment:9>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
