#10025: sloane_sequence(111776)[2][:36] != sloane.A111776.list(36)
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
   Reporter:  donmorrison         |       Owner:  sage-combinat  
       Type:  defect              |      Status:  needs_review   
   Priority:  minor               |   Milestone:  sage-4.6.1     
  Component:  combinatorics       |    Keywords:  combinat sloane
     Author:  Yann Laigle-Chapuy  |    Upstream:  N/A            
   Reviewer:                      |      Merged:                 
Work_issues:                      |  
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
Changes (by ncohen):

  * status:  needs_work => needs_review


Comment:

 Replying to [comment:9 drkirkby]:

 > I's also puzzled that
 >
 > {{{
 > sage: sloane_find(sin(x)) # where I have not defined x
 > Searching Sloane's online database...
 > }}}

 Well, by default x is a symbolic variable, so "sin(x)" has some meaning
 already... Later on, I think the argument gets translated into a string,
 which still has meaning, and there shouldn't be anything wrong until the
 website answers that there is no sequence corresponding to this non-
 integer.

 To be honest I had used this method once or twice only since I know Sage,
 and I already did not like the fact that it could not be told to stay mute
 (and also that verbosity is the default behaviour). Well, it's getting
 slowly fixed `:-)`

 Nathann

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10025#comment:10>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to