#10025: sloane_sequence(111776)[2][:36] != sloane.A111776.list(36)
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
Reporter: donmorrison | Owner: sage-combinat
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-4.6.1
Component: combinatorics | Keywords: combinat sloane
Author: Yann Laigle-Chapuy | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
Comment(by drkirkby):
I think it is better that you and Nathan review each others patches, as I
don't consider myself qualified to check this - my pthon skills are not
good. There is no problem in having two authors and two reviewers, as long
as they review each others work, and not their own.
I guess I should open a ticket for the fact the code does not check its
input, but there are more serious cases. Try
{{{
sage: seed(1,2)
}}}
for example.
Dave
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10025#comment:12>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
