#9433: Put more files under revision control.
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Reporter: jhpalmieri | Owner: tbd
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.6.1
Component: distribution | Keywords:
Author: John Palmieri | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Leif Leonhardy | Merged:
Work_issues: |
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Comment(by jdemeyer):
Replying to [comment:77 jhpalmieri]:
> Regarding #10231, I'd like to see more discussion on sage-devel about
it. I know that leif disagrees, but I'm also interested in the idea of
combining the various non-root repos (scripts, examples, extcode, and the
main Sage library) into one. It seems like the Sage community should
decide about both of these issues in sage-devel rather than on a trac
ticket.
Well, there was some discussion at [http://groups.google.com/group/sage-
devel/browse_thread/thread/cc30eaf87b283881/c2290991827fec9c?hl=en_US&#c2290991827fec9c].
Personally, I simply don't see the need for merging sage, sage_scripts,
extcode, examples,... into one big spkg. So there is some disagreement on
this. But this disagreement should not stop us from doing something to
which most people seemed to agree: not repackaging extcode and examples
with every new Sage version (which is exactly what I want to accomplish
with #10231).
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9433#comment:79>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
