#10118: upgrade sphinx to version 1.0.4
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Reporter: mvngu | Owner: tbd
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.6.1
Component: packages | Keywords:
Author: Minh Van Nguyen | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Changes (by newvalueoldvalue):
* cc: sage-combinat (added)
* status: new => needs_review
* author: => Minh Van Nguyen
Old description:
> As the subject says. See this [http://groups.google.com/group/sage-
> devel/browse_thread/thread/8bad71b8a6a8382e sage-devel] thread for some
> background on why we need to upgrade [http://sphinx.pocoo.org/ Sphinx].
New description:
As the subject says. See this [http://groups.google.com/group/sage-
devel/browse_thread/thread/8bad71b8a6a8382e sage-devel] thread for some
background on why we need to upgrade [http://sphinx.pocoo.org/ Sphinx].
'''Apply:'''
1. Prerequisite: #9850.
1. The upgraded Sphinx package at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mvngu/spkg/standard/sphinx/sphinx-1.0.4.p0.spkg.
For reference, my patch for that spkg is [attachment:trac-10118_sphinx-
spkg.patch], but do not apply that patch; it's already applied to the
upgraded spkg.
1. Apply [attachment:trac-10118_sage-lib.patch] to the Sage library.
1. Apply [attachment:trac-10118_sagenb.patch] to the Sage notebook
library.
--
Comment:
See the ticket description for instructions on which patch/spkg to apply.
Here are the results of my testing.
* bsd.math -- Both the HTML and PDF versions of the documentation built
OK.
* cicero.skynet -- The HTML version of the documentation built OK, with
numerous warnings regarding a missing LaTeX installation. This also meant
that I can't build the PDF version of the documentation.
* cleo.skynet -- Sage 4.6.1.alpha0 fails to build on this machine, hence
can't test building the documentation.
* eno.skynet -- The HTML version of the documentation built OK, with
numerous warnings regarding a missing LaTeX installation. This also meant
that I can't build the PDF version of the documentation.
* flavius.skynet -- The PDF version of the documentation built fine. The
HTML version built with numerous warnings due to missing the dvipng
command.
* gcc11 -- The HTML documentation built OK, with some warnings due to an
incomplete LaTeX installation. Can't build the PDF version of the
documentation due to this reason.
* gcc16 -- The HTML documentation built OK, with some warnings due to an
incomplete LaTeX installation. Can't build the PDF version of the
documentation due to this reason.
* hawk (David Kirkby's !OpenSolaris box) -- Both the PDF and HTML
versions of the documentation built fine.
* iras.skynet -- Sage 4.6.1.alpha0 fails to build on this machine, hence
can't test building the documentation.
* lena.skynet -- The HTML version of the documentation built OK, with
numerous warnings about a missing LaTeX installation, hence cannot parse
math expressions typeset using LaTeX. The missing LaTeX installation also
prevents us from building the PDF version of the documentation.
* rh.math -- Has a LaTeX installation, but missing utf8x.def, hence
unable to successfully build the PDF version of the documentation. The
HTML version of the documentation built with numerous warnings due to
missing utf8x.def.
* rosemary.math -- Sage 4.6.1.alpha0 fails to build on this machine,
hence can't test building the standard documentation.
* sage.math -- Both the HTML and PDF versions of the documentation built
fine.
* sextus.skynet -- The HTML version of the documentation built OK, with
numerous warnings about a missing LaTeX installation, hence cannot parse
math expressions typeset using LaTeX. The missing LaTeX installation also
prevents us from building the PDF version of the documentation.
* taurus.skynet -- The HTML documentation built fine. This machine
doesn't have a LaTeX installation, so I can't build the PDF version of the
documentation.
What the above tests mean is that the HTML documentation can be built
without a LaTeX installation, but the resulting documentation would not
render LaTeX typeset math expressions. For best result, you should install
a LaTeX distribution on your system before building the Sage
documentation. Of course, when you compile Sage, the configure script that
is first run does warn about having a LaTeX installation if your system
doesn't already have a LaTeX installation.
[[BR]]
I'm CC'ing the sage-combinat team because [attachment:trac-10118_sage-
lib.patch] touches files in the combinatorics module.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10118#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
