#9713: Add toric Chow group
----------------------------------------------+-----------------------------
   Reporter:  vbraun                          |       Owner:  AlexGhitza  
       Type:  enhancement                     |      Status:  needs_review
   Priority:  major                           |   Milestone:  sage-4.6.1  
  Component:  algebraic geometry              |    Keywords:              
     Author:  Volker Braun                    |    Upstream:  N/A         
   Reviewer:  Andrey Novoseltsev              |      Merged:              
Work_issues:  coordinate order of components  |  
----------------------------------------------+-----------------------------

Comment(by kcrisman):

 Just a minor point - there is a lot of reference to the Chow group of this
 and that, but it's apparently only the 'toric' Chow group, as noted at the
 beginning of the file.  Is it typical in the literature to conflate these
 notions - or is there a theorem that they are equivalent for toric
 varieties?  This should be clarified somehow, maybe even with an example
 of where they are not the same.  It would be unfortunate if they were
 *not* the same and someone later wanted to implement regular Chow groups!

 Forgive me if the question is naive; I am fairly familiar with 'regular'
 Chow groups but hadn't encountered this (natural) version before.  If
 there is a foundational paper, it would be helpful to refer to that in the
 documentation as well; the Wikipedia page referenced doesn't actually
 refer to the 'toric' variety at all.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9713#comment:11>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to