#10604: Rewrite diagonal matrix constructor
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Reporter: rbeezer | Owner: ddrake
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-4.6.2
Component: linear algebra | Keywords:
Author: Rob Beezer | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Dan Drake | Merged:
Work_issues: |
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Changes (by rbeezer):
* status: needs_review => needs_work
Comment:
Replying to [comment:6 ddrake]:
Thanks, Dan. The int64 makes sense, I think I need to return the `NumPy`
matrices sooner, and coerce them further. The Smith Normal Form certainly
should involve diagonal matrices, but I can't quite see where that is
coming from (and the failure was not evident in my tests run last night).
I'll get back to it again in a bit.
Rob
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10604#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
