#9497: Fix the Singular spkg so it can take advantage of building in parallel
----------------------------------------------+-----------------------------
   Reporter:  was                             |       Owner:  GeorgSWeber 
       Type:  enhancement                     |      Status:  needs_review
   Priority:  minor                           |   Milestone:  sage-4.7    
  Component:  build                           |    Keywords:  singular    
     Author:  Martin Albrecht, John Palmieri  |    Upstream:  N/A         
   Reviewer:                                  |      Merged:              
Work_issues:                                  |  
----------------------------------------------+-----------------------------

Comment(by drkirkby):

 Replying to [comment:10 jhpalmieri]:
 > As far as doctesting goes, it's probably not sufficient, but testing
 sage/sage/libs/singular/ is a quick check to make sure things are working.
 True. It would be nice if there was some way of knowing what tests made
 use of Singular or any other part of Sage.

 I've not checked this, but I've just started a build with this script.

 $ make && ./new.sh

 where {{{new.sh}}} is:

 {{{
 #!/bin/bash

 set -o pipefail

 export MAX_COMPILER_DELAY_IN_MICRO_SECONDS=5000000
 export PATH=/usr/local/gcc-4.5.0-delayed/bin/:$PATH
 export CC=/usr/local/gcc-4.5.0-delayed/bin/gcc
 export CXX=/usr/local/gcc-4.5.0-delayed/bin/g++

 JOBS=12
 RUNS=500
 for I in `seq $RUNS`;
 do
     LOG="singular-3-1-1-4-j$JOBS.log.$I"
     if [ ! -f "$LOG" ]; then
         env MAKE="make -j$JOBS" ./sage -f singular-3-1-1-4.p6.spkg 2>&1 |
 tee "$LOG"
         CODE=$?
         ./sage -b  >> "$LOG"
         ./sage -t devel/sage/sage/libs/singular/ >> "$LOG"
         echo $0 run $I of $RUNS: code= $CODE
     fi
 done
 }}}

 That might well be totally broken - no idea, and are going to bed now, so
 I'm not going to check it.

 Dave

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9497#comment:11>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to