#9976: Decorated functions/methods have generic signature in documentation
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
Reporter: jsrn | Owner: jsrn
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.7
Component: documentation | Keywords: sphinx, documentation, cython
inspection
Author: jsrn, Simon King | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Simon King | Merged:
Work_issues: |
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
Comment(by jsrn):
Good job. Some questions:
1) When doing my previous example and calling
sageinspect.sage_getdoc(basetwo), I get the doc of functools.partial. Does
this always happen or only in these toy examples?
2) Why doesn't this work, and should it?
{{{
sage: import functools
sage: import sage.misc.sageinspect as si
sage: def mybase(x=1, y=2):
....: return x + y
sage: deriv = functools.partial(mybase, x=3)
sage: si.sage_getargspec(deriv)
<BOOM>
sage: si.sage_getsource(deriv)
<BOOM>
}}}
What if I put the stuff in a file?
3) Partial functions on partial functions seem to will never work with
your patch; perhaps you should have the check in a while loop or call the
method recursively. This might pertain to other checks in the codes as
well!
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9976#comment:151>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
