#11232: we should not build patch on Cygwin
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  dimpase       |          Owner:  tbd         
       Type:  defect        |         Status:  needs_review
   Priority:  major         |      Milestone:  sage-4.7    
  Component:  cygwin        |       Keywords:              
Work_issues:                |       Upstream:  N/A         
   Reviewer:  David Kirkby  |         Author:              
     Merged:                |   Dependencies:              
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------

Comment(by dimpase):

 Replying to [comment:10 drkirkby]:
 One reason to have this patch in anyway is that with the current build
 system it is perfectly possible to install the patch spkg after the build
 is done (sage-spkg does not check prereqs). And the absence of the current
 patch to the patch spkg would create a problem, as the Sage's patch will
 break.

 This is a general weakness of the Sage build system, that also manifests
 elsewhere (e.g. it's possible to nuke any standard package this way, if
 there is an optional package of the same name, e.g. GLPK is an example).
 But this needs another ticket.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11232#comment:11>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to