#11232: we should not build patch on Cygwin
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Reporter: dimpase | Owner: tbd
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.7
Component: cygwin | Keywords:
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: David Kirkby | Author:
Merged: | Dependencies:
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Comment(by dimpase):
Replying to [comment:10 drkirkby]:
One reason to have this patch in anyway is that with the current build
system it is perfectly possible to install the patch spkg after the build
is done (sage-spkg does not check prereqs). And the absence of the current
patch to the patch spkg would create a problem, as the Sage's patch will
break.
This is a general weakness of the Sage build system, that also manifests
elsewhere (e.g. it's possible to nuke any standard package this way, if
there is an optional package of the same name, e.g. GLPK is an example).
But this needs another ticket.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11232#comment:11>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.