#11232: we should not build patch on Cygwin
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  dimpase       |          Owner:  tbd         
       Type:  defect        |         Status:  needs_review
   Priority:  major         |      Milestone:  sage-4.7    
  Component:  cygwin        |       Keywords:              
Work_issues:                |       Upstream:  N/A         
   Reviewer:  David Kirkby  |         Author:              
     Merged:                |   Dependencies:              
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------

Comment(by drkirkby):

 Replying to [comment:11 dimpase]:
 > Replying to [comment:10 drkirkby]:
 > One reason to have this patch in anyway is that with the current build
 system it is perfectly possible to install the patch spkg after the build
 is done (sage-spkg does not check prereqs). And the absence of the current
 patch to the patch spkg would create a problem, as the Sage's patch will
 break.

 Yes, it is possible to do that. But normally one would type "make" and let
 it do the work. If you manually install items in an abnormal order, you
 should either know what you are doing or expect a failed installation.

 > This is a general weakness of the Sage build system, that also manifests
 elsewhere (e.g. it's possible to nuke any standard package this way, if
 there is an optional package of the same name, e.g. GLPK is an example).
 > But this needs another ticket.

 Well, it's just crazy we have an old optional package with the same name
 is a current one in Sage. But that's an entirely different issue. I have
 created a ticket for that - #11247.

 If someone wants to screw up their Sage build it is not hard (I've done it
 myself), but we should try to prevent it as much as possible. Hence
 checking they have the right perquisites should be done at the start of
 the build process.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11232#comment:12>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to