#10952: better numerical accuracy testing
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: robertwb | Owner: mvngu
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_info
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: doctest | Keywords:
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Author:
Merged: | Dependencies:
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Comment(by robertwb):
No, that is correct.
The example in the description is an example of something that would pass
doctests (even though the true output doesn't match exactly, you're seeing
what the actual output is).
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10952#comment:9>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
