#10952: better numerical accuracy testing
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: robertwb | Owner: mvngu
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: doctest | Keywords:
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Jason Grout | Author: Robert Bradshaw
Merged: | Dependencies:
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Changes (by newvalueoldvalue):
* status: needs_info => needs_review
* reviewer: => Jason Grout
* author: => Robert Bradshaw
Comment:
Replying to [comment:12 jason]:
> Thanks! If we had a github pull system, or a system where I could edit
the patch inline, I would have fixed it.
I have to admit that ''would'' be convenient. But wouldn't that create a
privileged class of commit people who don't need review? At least that
seems to be the model for the projects I'm familiar with.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10952#comment:13>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
