#10952: better numerical accuracy testing
-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------
Reporter: robertwb | Owner: mvngu
Type: enhancement | Status: positive_review
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: doctest | Keywords:
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Jason Grout, Mariah Lenox | Author: Robert Bradshaw
Merged: | Dependencies:
-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------
Changes (by mariah):
* status: needs_review => positive_review
* reviewer: Jason Grout => Jason Grout, Mariah Lenox
Comment:
Replying to [comment:16 robertwb]:
> True. It doesn't work with print (or other non-expression statements).
I've created #11336 to generalize it.
>
> I think that this is still plenty useful even with that limitation
Agreed. I am just doing my "reviewer" duty.
Positive review.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10952#comment:17>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
