#11444: optional package cbc-2.3.p2.spkg does not build on some platforms on
sage-4.7.1.alpha1
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Reporter: mariah | Owner: tbd
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-4.7.2
Component: optional packages | Keywords:
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Author:
Merged: | Dependencies:
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Changes (by john_perry):
* cc: kcrisman (added)
Comment:
Replying to [comment:4 ncohen]:
> Then maybe this doctest should be removed. We've been adding a very hard
one in #11324 anyway, so this small example could disappear without much
to worry about. This is a problem that appears very often with LP solvers
: they all give good answers, but it's a mess to write doctests when the
answers have no reason to be unique `:-)`
>
> If it's fine by you I can modify my patch at #11324 to fix it there !
Is there no way to generate a "canonical" answer from both packages? (Does
that even make sense mathematically? I'm not familiar with the gale ryser
theorem.) If not, I agree with Nathann.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11444#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
