#11444: optional package cbc-2.3.p2.spkg does not build on some platforms on
sage-4.7.1.alpha1
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Reporter: mariah | Owner: tbd
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-4.7.2
Component: optional packages | Keywords: sd32
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Author:
Merged: | Dependencies:
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Comment(by ncohen):
> Is there no way to generate a "canonical" answer from both packages?
(Does that even make sense mathematically? I'm not familiar with the gale
ryser theorem.) If not, I agree with Nathann.
Not that I know. When I write doctests using LP, I try to find examples
for which the solution is unique, but there are many matrices solving the
gale-ryser proble (ryser's algorithm even lets one enumerate them), and
the solvers have no reason to return one rather than the other. Adding a
fake objective functions to make the answer unique on the same problem
would touch the running time just to make the doctests easier to write,
which clearly isn't a good idea :-D
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11444#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
