#10453: Problem with old submodule
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  davidloeffler  |          Owner:  craigcitro     
       Type:  defect         |         Status:  positive_review
   Priority:  major          |      Milestone:  sage-4.7.2     
  Component:  modular forms  |       Keywords:                 
Work_issues:                 |       Upstream:  N/A            
   Reviewer:  Johan Bosman   |         Author:  David Loeffler 
     Merged:                 |   Dependencies:                 
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------

Old description:

> Weird things happen if you try to compute the old submodule of a Gamma1
> modular forms space. E.g.
>
> {{{
> sage: CuspForms(Gamma1(11), 2).old_submodule() # crashes
> }}}
>
> This turns out to be because:
>
> {{{
> sage: ModularForms(Gamma1(11),
> 2).hecke_module_of_level(1).hecke_module_of_level(11)
> Modular Forms space of dimension 2 for Congruence Subgroup Gamma0(11) of
> weight 2 over Rational Field
> }}}
>
> so the degeneracy level-raising map is getting computed for the wrong
> space!
>
> Prerequisite for #11601. (Note that #11601 depends on a bunch of other
> stuff as well, but this ticket is independent of any of the other patches
> in the series.)

New description:

 Weird things happen if you try to compute the old submodule of a Gamma1
 modular forms space. E.g.

 {{{
 sage: CuspForms(Gamma1(11), 2).old_submodule() # crashes
 }}}

 This turns out to be because:

 {{{
 sage: ModularForms(Gamma1(11),
 2).hecke_module_of_level(1).hecke_module_of_level(11)
 Modular Forms space of dimension 2 for Congruence Subgroup Gamma0(11) of
 weight 2 over Rational Field
 }}}

 so the degeneracy level-raising map is getting computed for the wrong
 space!

 Prerequisite for #11601. (Note that #11601 depends on a bunch of other
 stuff as well, but this ticket is independent of any of the other patches
 in the series.)

 ----

 Apply [attachment:trac_10453_gamma1_old_submodule.patch] to the Sage
 library.

--

Comment(by leif):

 Replying to [comment:6 johanbosman]:
 > I did get the following while applying the patch:
 {{{
 applying trac_10453_gamma1_old_submodule.patch
 patching file sage/modular/hecke/ambient_module.py
 Hunk #10 succeeded at 883 with fuzz 1 (offset 6 lines).
 now at: trac_10453_gamma1_old_submodule.patch
 }}}
 > but according to [http://groups.google.com/group/sage-
 
devel/browse_thread/thread/c5af325e984d8ab4/cb85c8767055af0e?lnk=gst&q=fuzz#cb85c8767055af0e
 this discussion], fuzz 1 is okay.  Hence: positive review. ;).

 In this case, you could re-export the patch and upload the rebased
 version.

 IMHO one should inspect any fuzz anyway.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10453#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to