#8327: Implement the universal cyclotomic field, using Zumbroich basis
---------------------------------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: nthiery | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status:
needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.8
Component: number fields | Keywords:
Cyclotomic field, Zumbroich basis
Work_issues: Rebase wrt #10771. Fix one doctest. | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Author: Christian
Stump, Simon King
Merged: | Dependencies: #10771
---------------------------------------------------+------------------------
Changes (by SimonKing):
* status: needs_review => needs_work
* work_issues: Rebase wrt #10771. Fix doctests. => Rebase wrt #10771.
Fix one doctest.
Comment:
Starting with sage-4.8.alpha0 plus the new Cython plus your patch (rebased
in the obvious way) plus the lazy_import patch, we are down to one error:
{{{
sage -t "devel/sage-
main/sage/rings/universal_cyclotomic_field/universal_cyclotomic_field.py"
**********************************************************************
File "/mnt/local/king/SAGE/rebase/sage-4.8.alpha0/devel/sage-
main/sage/rings/universal_cyclotomic_field/universal_cyclotomic_field.py",
line 274:
sage: UCF.is_subring(UCF)
Expected:
True
Got:
False
**********************************************************************
1 items had failures:
1 of 4 in __main__.example_5
***Test Failed*** 1 failures.
For whitespace errors, see the file
/mnt/local/king/.sage/tmp/universal_cyclotomic_field_4421.py
[3.3 s]
}}}
Any idea why that occurs?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8327#comment:54>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
