#8327: Implement the universal cyclotomic field, using Zumbroich basis
------------------------------------------------+---------------------------
   Reporter:  nthiery                           |          Owner:               
                    
       Type:  enhancement                       |         Status:  needs_work   
                    
   Priority:  major                             |      Milestone:  sage-4.8     
                    
  Component:  number fields                     |       Keywords:  Cyclotomic 
field, Zumbroich basis
Work_issues:  Rebase wrt #10771. Fix doctests.  |       Upstream:  N/A          
                    
   Reviewer:                                    |         Author:  Christian 
Stump, Simon King      
     Merged:                                    |   Dependencies:  #10771       
                    
------------------------------------------------+---------------------------

Comment(by stumpc5):

 Replying to [comment:44 nthiery]:
 > Replying to [comment:41 SimonKing]:
 > > When starting with sage-4.8.alpha0 plus the stuff from #11761 (new
 cython), one quite big hunk of your new patch fails to apply. It concerns
 sage/categories/fields.py.
 > >
 > > I found at least one reason for the mismatch: By trac ticket #10771
 (sorry, it's one of mine...), `Fields()` has some `ElementMethods` (your
 patch assumes that there are none). Since #10771 has been merged in
 sage-4.7.2, I make this a dependency.
 >
 > IIRC, this patch already applies on 4.7.2: I already rebased it last
 week upon 10771. Ah ah, I was in a hurry, and probably forgot to upload it
 on trac, sorry. Please take the latest version from the sage-combinat
 patch server.

 I did the same mistake the other way round: I did changes about 5 weeks
 ago, and only putted it on trac but not on the combinat queue...

 I just merged both versions, and the doctest should pass now, and it
 should be rebased (both only if I didn't do any mistakes...).

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8327#comment:45>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to